Systematic reviews from chat: PRISMA 2020 diagrams, risk-of-bias figures, kappa and AI screening.
Connect Remote server
claude mcp add --transport http revisia https://revisia.es/mcp{
"mcpServers": {
"revisia": {
"url": "https://revisia.es/mcp"
}
}
}{
"servers": {
"revisia": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://revisia.es/mcp"
}
}
}Settings > Connectors > Add custom connector
URL: https://revisia.es/mcpTools 26 found in our last check
revisia_prisma_flow_diagramUse this when the user needs a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for a systematic review and already has the counts per stage (records per database or register, duplicates, screened, excluded, reports sought and assessed, exclusion reasons, studies included). Draws the official template…
revisia_risk_of_bias_figureUse this when the user has risk-of-bias judgements per study and wants the traffic-light plot and the weighted or unweighted summary bar chart (robvis style) for RoB 2, RoB 1, ROBINS-I, ROBINS-I V2, ROBINS-E, QUADAS-2, PROBAST, Newcastle-Ottawa (also its cross-sectional adaptati…
revisia_interrater_agreementUse this when the user wants agreement statistics between reviewers, e.g. for dual screening or data extraction: Cohen's kappa (unweighted, linear or quadratic weights) for two raters, Fleiss' kappa for three or more, with Gwet's AC1/AC2, PABAK, 95% confidence interval, p-value,…
revisia_prisma_checklistUse this when the user needs the completed PRISMA 2020 reporting checklist (27 items, plus the 12-item PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts) to submit with a manuscript. Takes, for each item the user has checked, its status (reported, not reported, not applicable) and where it is reported…
revisia_account_statusShow the signed-in researcher's plan, per-account caps and which bibliographic sources their plan unlocks. Call this before planning work that consumes quota (searching, screening, extraction) so you know the ceilings you are working under.
revisia_helpReturn revisia's own guide for AI agents: what the platform does, the ten-stage methodological spine, and what an agent may and may not do on the researcher's behalf. Call this when unsure how a step of the review works before guessing.
revisia_projectsUse this when you need the researcher's reviews or where one stands. action list: reviews owned by the account, newest first. action status: corpus size, identification and deduplication counts, screening decision counts, criteria version and records to re-screen, approved stage…
revisia_projects_actUse this when the researcher wants a new review or to reword its question. action create (title and question required) first checks the question with revisia's AI, as the web app does, within the daily check quota: if the verdict is ok it creates the review; otherwise it creates…
revisia_questionUse this when you need the review question, its concepts and the eligibility criteria, including AI-suggested criteria that are waiting for the researcher. action list_criteria. Read-only.
revisia_question_actUse this when preparing stage 1 and the eligibility criteria. action check: AI quality check of the question of a review that already exists (framework, missing parts, better wording; new reviews are checked by create). action suggest_pico: AI breakdown into concepts (saved only…
revisia_searchUse this when you need the search strategy (action status: active and inactive concept blocks, the saved query per database, what each search retrieved, the latest import; detail full prints whole queries) or a record count before running (action estimate, no AI). If the researc…
revisia_search_actUse this when preparing stage 2. action build: AI proposes the concept blocks and saves them (save: false to only look); it runs as a job and answers at once, so wait with revisia_jobs (kind strategy) and call build again to get the proposal without new AI. action toggle_block:…
revisia_screeningUse this when you need the title/abstract screening decisions: per record the decision, whether a human or the AI made it, and per criterion the verdict and the reason quoting the abstract, with a flag saying whether the quote was found verbatim. action results (filter by decisi…
revisia_screening_actUse this when the researcher wants AI screening run or a screening decision recorded. action run: dry_run defaults to true and reports how many records the AI would screen, how many go to human verification under the plan's quota and what blocks the launch; dry_run false launche…
revisia_fulltextUse this when you need the full-text stage: which included records have a full text (PDF, PMC text or both), which were not retrieved, and the full-text decisions with who made them and why (action list, paginated). Read-only.
revisia_fulltext_actUse this when the researcher wants open-access full texts retrieved (action fetch, no AI) or full-text screening run by AI (action run), or a full-text decision recorded (action decide: only one the researcher states for a named study, never your own; confirm study and reason fi…
revisia_extractionUse this when you need the data extraction table: one row per included study, one column per variable, each cell with its value and whether its supporting quote was verified (action table, paginated; with_quotes adds the quotes). Read-only.
revisia_extraction_actUse this when preparing data extraction. action suggest_columns: AI proposes columns (not saved). action define_columns: save the columns the researcher accepts. action run: AI extraction; dry_run defaults to true and reports pending studies and blockers, dry_run false launches.…
revisia_robUse this when you need the risk-of-bias assessments per study and domain with their supporting quotes (action summary, paginated) or the traffic-light and summary figure (action figure). Read-only.
revisia_rob_actUse this when the researcher wants AI risk-of-bias drafts (action run; dry_run defaults to true), a study's instrument changed (action set_tool, e.g. robins_e for exposures, nos for cohort or case-control, nos_cs for cross-sectional; RoB 2 only fits randomized trials) or a judge…
revisia_reportUse this when you need the review's outputs: the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram with its counts (action prisma), the citable Methods paragraph and how to cite revisia (action methods), or the manuscript draft (action manuscript). Read-only.
revisia_report_actUse this when the researcher wants the manuscript draft written from the approved stages (action manuscript). dry_run defaults to true; dry_run false generates it. Needs every earlier stage approved and a confirmed email.
revisia_exportUse this when the researcher needs a file from the review: screening decisions (screening_csv), included or all references (refs_ris, refs_ris_all), the audit trail (audit_csv), risk of bias (rob_csv) or the protocol (protocol_md). By default you get a summary and download_url (…
revisia_jobsUse this after launching anything long (import, search, strategy build, criteria suggestion, screening, full text, extraction, risk of bias): it waits up to about 45 seconds and returns status and done/total progress with the next steps. A finished screening job also says how ma…
revisia_approve_stageUse this when a stage looks finished: it returns which stage awaits approval (the first unapproved one; later ones stay locked), what the researcher should check and the exact words to tell them. In Claude and ChatGPT it shows the researcher an approve button in the chat; elsewh…
revisia_approve_stage_actCalled only by the approve button that revisia_approve_stage shows, when the researcher presses it. Not for the assistant: it needs a one-time code only the button has.
Details
| Endpoint | https://revisia.es/mcp (Streamable HTTP) |
| First published | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Last updated | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Registry name | es.revisia/revisia |
More communication servers See all
Listing data from the official MCP registry. Status and tools from NestDaddy's daily check. Browse all MCP servers.